Assuming a non-compete agreement in Texas is worded properly and supported by adequate consideration, the next question is whether the restrictions contained in the agreement are reasonable. Texas courts have routinely held that the scope of the restrictions should bear some relationship to the activities that the employee performed for his former employer. For example, if an employee performs...
Continue Reading“Texas is a right to work state–non-compete agreements are unenforceable here.” You’ve heard that 100 times, right? I know I have. And it is dead wrong. The fact that Texas is a “right to work” state means that Texas employees can’t be forced to join a union. It has nothing to do with whether non-compete agreements are enforceable. In...
Continue ReadingA recurring issue in Texas law is whether financial compensation can constitute sufficient consideration for a non-compete agreement. This issue came up recently in a case from the Dallas Court of Appeals. In that case, a company that provided insurance brokerage services granted some stock options to one of its managing directors. The options were conveyed in an Employee...
Continue ReadingTexas courts have long held that an employer’s providing of confidential information can constitute sufficient consideration for a non-compete agreement. But it can be difficult to apply this widely accepted premise, as was demonstrated in a recent case. In the case, an insurance broker signed an employment agreement in which he acknowledged that he would receive confidential information: This...
Continue ReadingA recurring issue in non-compete cases involves how definite the employer’s promise to provide confidential information must be for the agreement to be enforceable. Historically, disputes have focused on whether an explicit promise to provide the information was required, or whether an implied promise (e.g., language in which the employee "acknowledged" that he would receive information) was sufficient. In...
Continue ReadingA recent case from the federal court in Dallas sheds some light on various issues involving the enforceability of non-compete agreements. In Staples, Inc. v. Sandler, No. 3:07-CV-0928-K, 2008 WL 4107656 (N.D. Tex. Aug. 29, 2008), the employee, Sandler, upon joining Staples, Inc., signed a “Proprietary and Confidential Information Agreement” and a separate “Non-Compete and Non-Solicitation Agreement” (“Non-Compete Agreement”)....
Continue ReadingAlmost two years ago, in the Sheshunoff case, the Texas Supreme Court rejected the notion that an employer must provide the employee with confidential information at the precise moment the non-compete agreement is signed for the agreement to be enforceable. According to the court, it is not fatal to the agreement’s enforceability if the information is actually provided sometime later....
Continue ReadingA recent opinion issued by the federal Southern District of Texas sheds a little light on the question of how definite a promise to provide confidential information must be for a noncompete agreement to be enforceable. In Teel v. Hospital Partners of America Inc., No. H-06-3991, 2008 WL 346377 (S.D. Tex. Feb. 6, 2008), the court, quoting the Light case,...
Continue ReadingIn a recent Texas case involving a restrictive covenant, the plaintiff contended that the duration of the non-compete covenant should be judicially extended beyond the agreement’s normal expiration date. In that case, the seller of a dance studio entered into an agreement in which she promised not to compete with the buyer. As is true in most states, non-compete covenants contained...
Continue ReadingWhat happens if an employer seeking to enforce a non-compete agreement is itself in breach of the agreement. Does the employer’s previous breach adversely affect its ability to enforce the non-compete? Maybe. It’s "hornbook" law in Texas that one party to a contract is precluded from enforcing a contract if that party itself is in “material” breach. In DeSantis v....
Continue Reading