| Read Time: 4 minutes | #Noncompete Agreements

Texas NonCompete Agreements: Court Rules Explicit Promise Not Required

Almost two years ago, in the Sheshunoff case, the Texas Supreme Court rejected the notion that an employer must provide the employee with confidential information at the precise moment the non-compete agreement is signed for the agreement to be enforceable. According to the court, it is not fatal to the agreement’s enforceability if the information is actually provided sometime later....

Continue Reading

| Read Time: 2 minutes | #Noncompete Agreements

Texas Noncompete Agreements Enforceable? More Clarification on How Definite Promise to Provide Must Be

 A recent opinion issued by the federal Southern District of Texas sheds a little light on the question of how definite a promise to provide confidential information must be for a noncompete agreement to be enforceable. In Teel v. Hospital Partners of America Inc., No. H-06-3991, 2008 WL 346377 (S.D. Tex. Feb. 6, 2008), the court, quoting the Light case,...

Continue Reading

| Read Time: 2 minutes | #Noncompete Agreements

Texas Non-Compete Law: Can Duration of Non-Compete Agreements be “Equitably Extended”?

In a recent Texas case involving a restrictive covenant, the plaintiff contended that the duration of the non-compete covenant should be judicially extended beyond the agreement’s normal expiration date. In that case, the seller of a dance studio entered into an agreement in which she promised not to compete with the buyer. As is true in most states, non-compete covenants contained...

Continue Reading

| Read Time: < 1 minute | #Noncompete Agreements

Texas Noncompete Agreements: Effect of Employer Breach

What happens if an employer seeking to enforce a non-compete agreement is itself in breach of the agreement.  Does the employer’s previous breach adversely affect its ability to enforce the non-compete?  Maybe. It’s "hornbook" law in Texas that one party to a contract is precluded from enforcing a contract if that party itself is in “material” breach. In DeSantis v....

Continue Reading

| Read Time: < 1 minute | #Noncompete Agreements

Enforceable Noncompete Agreements: Is At-Will Employment Really “Illusory”?

Texas courts routinely hold that at-will employment is "illusory" consideration.  Because the employer is free to terminate the employee at any time, the courts reason, giving an at-will job to someone is, legally speaking, meaningless.  Thus, non-compete agreements in Texas based upon that consideration are unenforceable. Not all states agree.  While researching a noncompete matter in Illinois the other...

Continue Reading

| Read Time: 2 minutes | #Noncompete Agreements

Noncompete Agreements in Texas: Forum Selection Provisions Are Enforceable

Texas courts have long held that Texas law should determine whether non-compete agreements affecting Texas residents are enforceable.  As a result, Texas courts generally will not enforce out-of-state choice of law provisions.  However, as a recent Texas Supreme Court case illustrates, contractual forum selection provisions can alter that result. In Re AutoNation, Inc. involved a suit filed in Broward...

Continue Reading

| Read Time: 2 minutes | #Noncompete Agreements

Noncompete Agreements in Texas: Some Restrictions Are Overly Broad

Non-compete agreements routinely provide for the employer to get injunctive relief in the event the employee engages in post-employment competition. In a recent case, the agreement in question subjected the employee to potentially harsher penalties.  The non-compete in question contained the following provisions: 14.     Restrictive Covenant. In consideration of the benefits being provided to the Employee pursuant to this Agreement as...

Continue Reading

| Read Time: 2 minutes | #Noncompete Agreements

Texas Employment Agreements: To Obtain Reformation of Noncompete Agreements in Texas, Seek Injunctive Relief

In a recent case in Houston, the First District Court of Appeals upheld a trial court’s failure to reform an overly broad covenant not to compete. The covenant was overly broad in three respects: (a) there was no geographical limitation; (b) the covenant prohibited the employee from contacting all of his former employer’s customers, not merely the customers with whom the...

Continue Reading